Organ Transplants — Part 2: Eleven Reasons Why Not!
By Gita Saraydarian
Why am I against organ transplants? Here are some reasons:
1. It retards the evolving path of the departed soul by tying it to the physical earth; it complicates the life of the recipient with the karma of the departed. Every physical part of our bodies is impressed by the experiences of all the lifetimes lived on earth. When a soul is born into a body, all the recordings in the soul from previous lives are impressed on the physical body. Then added to this mix are all of the person’s physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual life experiences from the present life. The recipient takes on the complete personal recordings and life histories of the donor as well as his or her karma from all lifetimes. We are in a double bind: The departed soul is tied to the physical plane, to the recipient, for as long as the recipient lives. The recipient is tied to the departed. This is why we have so many documented cases of recipients taking on the characteristics of the donor, even to the point of developing the same kind of immune system. The result is one body part with two souls attached to it.
2. It emphasizes quick fixes and does not look for causes of illness in the physical, emotional, mental, and karmic worlds; it takes the “easy” and material path to dealing with human problems.
3. It encourages criminal and ethically questionable practices by governments, hospitals, and medical personnel. Everyone focuses on quick fixes.
4. It encourages people to desire life at the expense of others; it makes people physically and materially centered at the expense of the overall spiritual principles of life. In wishing for an organ for oneself, one is in effect wishing for someone else to die and make his or her body parts available.
5. It forces poor people to sell body parts and preys on the weak, the poor, and the defenseless; it unfairly tips the scales toward the rich and powerful.
6. It makes the families of the departed feel guilty and depraved if they choose not to donate the organs of the departed.
7. It promotes the erroneous involvement by politicians, popular actors and media savvy persons, as well as medical centers into trying to manage life and its meaning, instead of leaving these questions to the spiritual aspects of one’s life.
8. It demeans the sanctity of human life and takes advantage of the departed at their most vulnerable point in physical live.
9. It ignores the complexity and depth of human life, human experiences, the purpose of life, the subtle bodies of human beings, and dismisses the ramifications of manipulating the natural process of life. It focuses only on the immediate material needs for living.
10. It promotes fear of illness and death, likening both to battles to be fought and “won” instead of being processes for learning and redemption.
11. It encourages a person to attach to physical life when all signs point to the need to leave this plane for a short time and re-emerge. It prevents a person from learning key lessons from the karmic conditions that brought the person to the illness or situation. If we learn from our life conditions, these conditions will not be repeated. If we do not learn from them, and cover them up, the fixes are only temporary and we will still need to deal with the causes next time around. The misery and suffering is therefore complicated further and lasts longer than it needs to.
We should indeed take proper medical services needed to live healthy and productive lives. We need to learn to live in a healthy and natural way and learn the causes of a healthy life. I do not believe in suicide nor do I believe in assisted suicide. There is a deeply spiritual and redemptive quality in learning our lessons well in each lifetime, whether we are the sick and suffering or the caretaker of the sick and suffering.
But we do not need to prolong a sick physical body. We are not simply our physical bodies. We are not simply material beings destined to be fertilizers on earth. We need not feel guilty for not donating organs. Nor do we need to make bereaving relatives and family members feel guilty for not donating body parts of a deceased relative. Our life quality is not measured by years on earth in one lifetime; we have thousands of lifetimes in which to grow and learn.
Fear of aging, fear of illness, and fear of dying keeps us tied to the physical existence as if nothing else exits. Fear forces us to emphasize the outer at the expense of inner development; it is extremely short sighted. We grieve when we lose a loved one. This is natural and should take its course. We grieve for our own loss since essentially we cannot grieve for the departure of the other person. No one belongs to us and each person takes birth into a particular family and nation, and then moves out of it. Every birth puts us in a different configuration. This is not news and is taught in all the Ancient Wisdom traditions. We do not belong to one family forever, to one nation forever, to one religion forever, to one race forever. The soul experiences all facets of human life and human existence on earth.
My views are not meant to hurt or insult anyone. Each person should have the freedom to make decisions based on his or her belief system and these decisions should not be forced on us by our religious leaders, politicians, doctors, popular figures, financial considerations, and the like. I am advocating a truly informed decision based on a holistic view of life and not a decision based on sappy emotionalism and pushy sentimentality that is forced on us having undercurrents of dubious motives.
Being treated with dignity at our most vulnerable time is our human right. Every human being has the right to be treated with dignity, no matter what he or she has done. When you are dead, your body must be respected and treated with dignity. When you are dying, you need to be treated with dignity and not have vultures circling around you. When you are on the operating table, you need to know that you are being treated with dignity. It is at the most vulnerable times in our life that dignity outshines all human expressions. When we are not able to speak up for ourselves, it is the height of human dignity to find someone who will.
Thank you,
Gita
Additional Readings:
- “Organ Transplants,” a reprint from the book Other Worlds.
- Part 1 of Organ Transplants on Gita's blog
- More on grief on Gita's blog
- Link to Michael Tymn's article on Organ Transplants
Labels: Ageless Wisdom, Esoteric Teachings, Gita Saraydarian, Gita's blog, Gordon Brown, Michael Tymn, Organ Transplants, Other Worlds
8 Comments:
Gita, thank you very much for these enlightening posts about organ transplants. I haven't thought about this issue from a spiritual perspective. I totally agree that it is important to see the bigger picture of our lives based on cycles of birth and death and not get tangled in trying to prolong our physical existence at the expense of others.
I would also love to hear your opinion about use of stem cells and blood transfusion.
Wed Jan 30, 04:20:00 PM 2008
Hi Arman: Here are my thoughts on your two questions:
You had asked what I think about Stem cell research and blood transfusions?
I think to use one's own stem cells is perfectly OK. Here is a link to a
story that just appeared. But using the embryos for this is unethical. Blood
transfusions are a temporary help to someone who needs the blood to survive.
The donor is alive and gives blood. Yes, the subtle energies of the donor
are mixed with the recipient, but it is temporary and does not tie the two
persons together forever. Over time, the blood circulates and the patient
himself generates his own blood.
On this account also we need to have better solutions. We need to find
alternatives to blood transfusions due to the instability of the donor banks
and the inability to have 100% purity in the donor's blood. People build up
their own blood bank if they know they need to undergo surgery. But this is
not always predictable. Many people have been infected due to sloppy
handling and checking of donor blood.
What I am also saying is that when human beings appreciate the subtle
formations of the constitution of man, and understand the etheric body and
the vehicles, then science could investigate causes of disease and how to
heal and change the underlying problems rather then be involved with
patching up people. The problems with organ transplants and the market for
them is absolutely huge and is a real ethical issue. There is a case now
online regarding stolen kidneys and how they are taken and sold. Lots of
information on this on the internet, some are reputed to be a hoax and some
are reported as actually having occurred. The information about use of
criminal organs in China is a real one and troubling.
Gita
Here is an interesting bit of news on stem cells. Finnish patient gets new jaw from own stem cells: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080201/ts_nm/finland_stemcells_dc
>>
Mon Feb 04, 11:25:00 AM 2008
Dear Gita:
This has answered my questions on these subjects. I had been mulling these around for so long and now I can see clearly from your ‘truth’ the reality behind it.
When I had my corneal graft they said I may have to have someone else’s tissue and I said no. They agreed they could use my mouth or legs and I said fine and in fact they only used the tissue from the back of my eye. I knew even then I should not have anyone else’s tissue in my body. Then I went on HRT due to early menopause and the first one made me feel awful. I went to the doctor and asked what exactly is in this as I am suspicious – well he told me and I said change it immediately. We need to take these things seriously. Placing bits of dead babies in cosmetics and drugs along with horses urine and hormones – this is just the start. Soon we will think it’s ok to create a whole army of human beings (except they won’t be human beings) and choosing skin and hair colour will pale into insignificance if we keep going. We are taking the Divinity out of life. It is so disrespectful…
Mon Feb 04, 01:20:00 PM 2008
I have just seen a press release from your organisation and have to say that I believe your teachings on organ transplantation to be wrongly motivated, misinformed, inaccurate and cruel. I would be the first to agree that any selling of organs or criminal involvement in this is an abomination, but it can be dealt with and must be stamped out. If God - or whatever your personal deity or belief system is - wished us to die, then we would die regardless of a transplant. We are not greater than God. God allows us to use the incredible gift of a transplanted organ for the benefit of others to live after our death. In the UK at least, the gift of an organ is given freely, and believe me no-one appreciates the cost of the organ (and I am not talking money here) more than the recipient. We feel more for the family involved than you can possibly know, and in my case they - and my donor - are forever in my thoughts and prayers. The people who donate organs, in the western world, do not die to provide the organs; their souls have already passed on. They are not held back in anyway, and it is ridiculous to postulate that they are.
There have been a few anecdotal cases of people retaining memories from the donor organ, and even if this should be true (and where is the concrete proof, I haven't seen any and there was none demonstrated in your press release), why is it a problem? And as for the immune system of the recipient becoming like that of the donor, as far as I am aware there has been ONE documented case of this. I understand that the young person in question was very ill for some time, and now, because of the situation, no longer has to take the immunosuppressant medication that all transplantees are obliged to take. One day perhaps, and I think the time will come, medical progress will mean that no recipients will have to take these drugs, which have their own downside.
I don't believe my donor will suffer in the afterlife - or the next life - by having donated her organs, possibly quite the reverse. And I do not believe that I will suffer either for having received an organ. There is nothing wrong with dying when it is your time to go. When it is your time, nothing human - transplant or otherwise - could prevent it. It is our duty to live as well as we can, and to this end we are doing nothing wrong, unethical or immoral in accepting whatever legal help may be available.
Your press release may well have caused a lot of hurt to a lot of people, both donor families and transplant recipients. Quite frankly I don't think that is a record to be proud of - unlike the transplant teams and donor families, who have a very great deal to be proud of.
Mon Feb 04, 01:21:00 PM 2008
Dear Writer:
My writing is not meant to be cruel or ill motivated but rather to point out another point of view. I think the debate has gone far too long in one direction and not enough voice given to those of us who believe otherwise. I did not attack anyone who has a different opinion, nor do I wish to be called cruel for having a different opinion.
For some of the interesting practices on organ "harvesting" see information coming out of China and India.
There are many people of different religious beliefs, even in the Christian religion, who do not believe in many of the medical practices that take place now. Why should we not voice our opinions and cause disagreement? The world does not have a homogenous point of view. Whenever there is something this important to humanity, we need all the opinions and choices and be able to make these choices based on really informed basis. We are all allowed to disagree and point out differences of opinion. When the medical community and the politicians try to force something down our lives, I have to object and I have to ask the questions. All of us have the duty to ask these difficult questions and living in a free country, we can all make our choices according to what we believe.
No one knows the will of God nor the purpose and plan for us in the subtle worlds. But we can ask and learn about the creation and the Creator in ways that are different than hitherto believed.
I live in a way that is consistent with my faith and my education and my research; so do you. I respect that and ask that I too be respected for presenting my views. That is what makes life interesting and complex and beautiful. The kind of afterlife and soul life that is taught in many world religions is the exact opposite of what is made to be the case in the medical community and by the politicians. There is another view, and I think we should look at it and not close our eyes to it.
I wish you all the best and health and long life. I think any decision that we make, when based on our best received information, is the right one for us.
Thank you for writing and taking the time to voice your feelings.
Gita
Mon Feb 04, 01:22:00 PM 2008
Dear Gita,
Thank you for taking the trouble to respond. As I said in my earlier email, I would be among the first to condemn the illegal marketing of organs, and I am aware of the situation in China - I have received press releases about it. There can be no justification for it, although one can perhaps understand the desperation of a parent with a dying child, or someone in a similar position, but that does not justify some of the practices that exist. And you are of course absolutely right, you have the right to your beliefs, we all do, and it is the variety of beliefs that helps to make the human race what it is. The problem was your press release did not sound like someone - or an organisation - voicing their own beliefs, it seemed to be an out and out condemnation of transplantation without any ifs or buts, and I'm sorry, but I think when we make statements we have bear in mind who may be affected by them. Your press release affected me deeply, and I'm sure would hurt anyone currently waiting for a transplant, not to mention people like me who have had one, and the families who have donated their loved ones' organs. I don't mean to infer that you are a cruel person, I'm sure that is not the case, and I did take the trouble to look at your website before I emailed so I know a little about your organisation - I'm sure it is a worthy one.
There is, I think, a world of difference between the terrible goings on in China and other similar trades in organs, and the system we have in place in the UK - I am not certain how it works in the US.
Thank you again for the response, it is appreciated, and to be honest I did not think I would get one! I thank you for your good wishes, and in my turn wish you all the best too. But I do hope you might consider that transplantation may have its place, and although it is true that there is a great deal of abuse in some parts of the world, that is not always the case and it does not make transplantation wrong in principle.
Mon Feb 04, 01:43:00 PM 2008
Dear Writer:
Thank you for your understanding response. I appreciate it very much.
Ethical issues are difficult to grabble with and take a lot of thinking and pondering from as many perspectives as we can. The more perspectives that we have, the better choices we can make.
I am against the practice, but do not condemn those who believe in it nor who have it. There is room for all of us. I want to inform of a different perspective so people know they have a choice.
I know of people who lost loved ones and the pressure to give organs was intense. The families that I know were made to feel guilty and some sort of inhumane for refusing to provide the organs. Family members argued against family members while the person dying was put on life support waiting to die.
If we air out all the parts of this debate, then it is serving the public interest and the individuals who may need think of alternatives. Also, the medical community could also focus on ways to repair our aging bodies with natural methods as well as look at the underlying causes for so many people having organ failures, such as kidney failure in India for example.
I think we are on the same page on the darker parts of this question.
Thank you again, all the best to you,
Gita
Mon Feb 04, 01:44:00 PM 2008
Anonymous said:
Dear Gita,
I respect your views and honour your right to die when your time comes. Mine should have been in 1982, but I was saved by an unknown donor and now I live a happy, and I trust, as honourable life as any of my fellow creatures. I have no guilt that I live on when another has died. Maybe as you say, my donor's soul is not released because it has not been cremated or buried. I hope however, that my donor' s soul will sit comfortable within me as I live my life to the best of my ability. Not wholly good, and not wholly bad. I am content and at ease with my life. I realise that life on this earth for all its creatures has both pain and joy. Some have more pain than joy,others more joy than pain. I have no problem with the aura that surrounds my and,when my time comes to pass over wherever we all go I shall have to go, with fear, I am sure I shall be afraid. It will make no difference, go I will to wherever. Be grateful, then, that you have a faith that when your time comes you will embrace the next phase.
I wish you well
Thu Feb 07, 11:09:00 AM 2008
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home